Humanists4Science

Pages

  • Home
  • H4S 2009-2010
  • H4S 2011-2013

Friday, 3 June 2011

Selective use of science should be on a par with racism or homophobia

source: http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/beddington-goes-to-war-against-bad-science via British Science Association June 2011, 'What geeks can learn from gays' by Mark Stevenson, who argues for intolerance!

... to be continued....
Posted by crabsallover at 00:39
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Public Understanding of Science

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Humanists4Science

Humanists4Science

Join Humanists4Science

Join Humanists4Science
Facebook Group

Join Humanists4Science

Join Humanists4Science
Discussion Group

Follow Humanists4Science on Twitter

Follow @Hum4Sci

About Humanists4Science (Hum4Sci)

Humanists4Science (H4S) Mission "To promote, within the humanist community, the application of the scientific method to issues of concern to broader society."

H4S Vision "A world in which important decisions are made by applying the scientific method to evidence rather than according to superstition."

H4S is for humanists with an active interest in science. We believe that science is a fundamental part of humanism but also that it should be directed to humane and ethical ends. Science is, in our view, more a method than a body of facts.

H4S take a naturalistic view and believe, like 62% of the UK population, that science, the scientific method & other evidence provides the best way to understand the universe.

H4S are a Special Interest Group of the British Humanist Association (BHA).

Since 2008 H4S members have discussed many Humanist-Science topics in our Yahoo Group.

Jim Al-Khalili (BHA President)

Jim Al-Khalili (BHA President)

Prof. Jim Al-Khalili - 11TH BHA President - On Scientific Method

'I have a rational unshakeable conviction that our universe is understandable, that mysteries are only mysteries because we have yet to figure out, the almost always logical answers. For me there is simply no room, no need, for a supernatural divine being to fill in the gaps in our understanding. We’ll get there, we’ll fill in those gaps with objective scientific truths: [with] answers that aren't subjective, because of cultural or historical whims or personal biases, but because of empirically testable and reproducible truths. We may not get the full picture, we may never get the full picture, but science allows us to get ever closer.’ Jim Al-Khalili, BHA AGM 2013
"A lot of people say science is just one way of looking at the world, at reality, and poets and musicians and, of course, people of faith, have said there are other ways. I don't buy that. For me there is an objective reality that is there and real. For a theoretical physicist who's trained in thinking about quantum mechanics, which involves the idea that by observing something you alter its nature, you have to have some sort of working definitions of reality"
Jim Al-Khalili in New Humanist magazine Mar Apr 2013

Humanists4Science Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (1)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2014 (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2013 (13)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (8)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2011 (48)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ▼  June (9)
      • PZ Myers & Richard Dawkins, London
      • 'What science will never know', Reith Lecture 2010...
      • Review of Sam Harris's "The Moral Landscape"
      • Simon Blackburn reviews 'The Moral Landscape' by S...
      • What geeks can learn from gays - Mark Stevenson ar...
      • Selective use of science should be on a par with r...
      • How Discourse About Homeopathy Was Affected By The...
      • What is a Sceptic? David Waldock
      • BIS/Ipsos MORI: Learning From Public Attitudes to ...
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (19)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (35)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)

Lord Taverne

Lord Taverne
Dick Taverne

Lord Taverne

Science depends on reason and regard for evidence. For me, the scientific approach lies at the heart of humanism as well as atheism. We all accept that science has made us healthier and wealthier. What has been seldom acknowledged or realised is that since the Enlightenment, which it helped to bring about, science has played an essential part in making us more civilised.

Science is the enemy of autocracy because it replaces claims to truth based on authority with those based on evidence and because it depends on the criticism of established ideas. Scientific knowledge is the enemy of dogma and ideologies and makes us more tolerant because it is tentative and provisional and does not deal in certainties. It is the most effective way of learning about the physical world and therefore erodes superstition, ignorance and prejudice, which have been causes of the denial of human rights throughout history. Science is also the enemy of narrow nationalism and tribalism and, like the arts, is one of the activities in this world that is not motivated by greed.

What can compare, for example, with the recent achievement of the Large Hadron Collider, a venture of collaboration by 10,000 scientists and engineers from 113 countries, free from bureaucratic and political interference? Those people put aside all national, political, religious and cultural differences in pursuit of truth and for the one purpose of exploring and understanding the natural world.

Without the contribution of science, which is, in my view, the rock on which atheism and humanism are built, we would be less inclined to be critical, tolerant and understanding and more prone to prejudice, bigotry and tribalism. We would be a less civilised society.

Lord Taverne, 25th July 2013, House of Lords debate on contribution of Humanism and Atheism

David Papineau on Materialism

David Papineau on Materialism

'Our world is a fully material world. We don’t need to go outside Physics to understand the constitution of the Universe. Anything non-material would be epiphenomena and could never have any effect on the material world.' David Papineau (video) on Materialism

Richard Dawkins (BHA Vice-President) on Scientific Method

Richard Dawkins (BHA Vice-President) on Scientific Method
'Scientific method is a system whereby working assumptions may be falsified by recourse to reason and evidence.' (Photo: Chris Street, 2006)

Peter Atkins (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method

Peter Atkins (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method
'The scientific method is the only reliable method of achieving knowledge. It displaces ignorance without destroying wonder.'
'Science can deal with all the serious questions that have troubled mankind for millennia' Peter Atkins
'My own faith, my scientific faith, is that there is nothing that the scientific method cannot illuminate and elucidate." Peter Atkins

Stephen Fry (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method

Stephen Fry (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method
'Reason is almost akin to superstition, ... reason must be tested, testing is the very basis of science.'

Matt Ridley (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method

Matt Ridley (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method
'Science is not a catalogue of facts, but a search for new mysteries. Science increases the store of wonder and mystery in the world; it does not erode it.'

Stephen Law (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method

Stephen Law (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method
'Empirical science is possibly the only tool ... for understanding the world around us'.

Lewis Wolpert (BHA Vice President) on Scientific Method

Lewis Wolpert (BHA Vice President) on Scientific Method
'Science is the best way to understand the world, for any set of observations, there is only one correct explanation. Science is value-free, as it explains the world as it is. Ethical issues arise only when science is applied to technology – from medicine to industry.'

Harry Kroto (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method

Harry Kroto (BHA Distinguished Supporter) on Scientific Method
'The methods of science are manifestly effective, having made massive humanitarian contributions to society. It is this very effectiveness which the purveyors of mystical philosophies attack, because they recognise in it the chief threat to the belief-based source of their power and financial reward.'

Join Humanists4Science Forum

Join Humanists4Science Forum
Science discussions for Humanists

Humanists4Science Post Labels

Science in society (21) Scientific Method (19) Religion as a social phenomenon (18) Religion versus science (12) Morality and science (9) evolution (8) Peter Atkins (6) Public Understanding of Science (6) Richard Dawkins (6) BHA Strategy (5) Carl Sagan (5) Stephen Law (5) Edge 2011 - What scientific toolkit would improve everybodys cognitive toolkit (4) Miscellaneous (4) Sam Harris (4) Everything from Nothing (3) Jim Al-Khalili (3) PZ Myers (3) empiricism (3) naturalism (3) scientism (3) Alex Rosenberg (2) BHA (2) Brian Cox (2) CFI (2) Carolyn Porco (2) Colin Blakemore (2) Lawrence Krauss (2) Michael Shermer (2) Neil DeGrasse Tyson (2) Richard Feynman (2) Scepticism (2) Science in BHA Strategy (2) Stephen Hawking (2) The Moral Landscape (2) big bang (2) creationism (2) homeopathy (2) methodological naturalism (2) religious fundamentalism (2) Andrea Sella (1) Antipositivism (1) Atheism (1) AtheismUK (1) Auguste Comte (1) BHA Distinguished Supporters (1) BHA Objects (1) Ben Miller (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bill Nye (1) Brian Greene (1) Can Science Solve Every Mystery? (1) Carlos Frenk (1) Claire L. Evans (1) Daniel Dennett (1) David Hume - is v ought (1) David Papineau (1) Definitions of Atheism (1) Etymology of Atheism (1) George Smoot (1) God of the Gaps (1) H4S strapline (1) Heliocentrism (1) Higgs field (1) Higgs particle (1) I'm a scientist get me out of here (1) Ian Stewart (1) Ipsos MORI (1) Jacob Bronowski (1) James Randi (1) James Watt (1) Jesus and Mo (1) Jill Bolte Taylor (1) Jill Tarter (1) Julian Baggini (1) Karl Popper (1) Large Hadron Collider LHC (1) Limits to Science (1) Mark Stevenson (1) Martin Rees (1) Mary Midgley (1) Mathematics (1) National Science Museum (1) New Atheism (1) Oliver Sacks (1) Paul Kurtz (1) Peter Atkins - On Being (1) Peter S Williams (1) Phil Plait (1) Positivism (1) Proving a Negative (1) Pseudoscience (1) Purpose of the Universe (1) Qi (1) Reductionism (1) Reith Lecture (1) Robert Winston (1) Science Resolution Revolution Competition (1) Science and Humanism (1) Science is Vital (1) Science on TV (1) Scientific Concepts (1) Self-Deception (1) Simon Blackburn (1) Simon Schaffer (1) Society (1) Stephen Fry (1) Talks by H4S (1) Tara Shears (1) The Skeptic Magazine (1) Theology (1) Thomas Kuhn (1) Tom Rees (1) Vilayanur Ramachandran (1) Willard Van Orman Quine (1) confirmed by observation (1) drugs (1) evidence (1) failure (1) falsification of theories (1) free will (1) gravity (1) hate mail (1) intelligent design (1) knowledge (1) meditation (1) metaphysical naturalism (1) non-empirical beliefs (1) piracy (1) police (1) policy (1) politics (1) prostitution (1) reason as superstition (1) reasonable beliefs (1) science and reason (1) science communication (1) science defined (1) science is beautiful (1) sensed presence (1) systematic testing (1) teaching evolution (1) ten dimensions (1) violence (1)

Contributors

  • David Flint
  • Epiphenom
  • Unknown
  • crabsallover
  • pepandy

H4S Support the 'Sense about Science'

H4S Support the 'Sense about Science'
'Ask for Evidence' campaign

Documents by H4S members

  • Religion as a social phenomenon: Epiphenom - a blog by Tom Rees, H4S committee member

Web sites with similar concerns

  • Humanists For A Better World
  • Center for Inquiry, London
  • British Humanist Association
  • Secular Medical Forum
  • Sense About Science

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Sites by H4S members

  • Epiphenom by Tom Rees
  • HASSNERS by crabsallover

Followers

Financing H4S

Support Humanists4Science

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.